Tons of bitfields in this file. Are these on-disk data structures? The maximum size of CRAMFS is 256MB. Multi-media file systems. XPRESS file system -
Extracting and Repacking . I can't resgin so thats as far as i got,,,Hope this helps.
It would be nice not to bring in legacy code. One issue which I'm aware of here is deciding what getting squashfs support into the kernel is meant to answer. If I drop too much support from the kernel patch, then the kernel squashfs support will not be adequate, and the developers will still have to patch their kernels with my third- party patches. Before I submitted this patch I factored out the Squashfs 1. If people don't want support for 1. I will drop it.. Isn't that a better job for klogd? The macros is only used by the superbock read routine and so I'll replace it with direct printks.
Is this purely endian conversion or do > filesystems of both endian persuasions exist? If the latter, let's not > keep that legacy. Pick an order, and use endian conversion functions > unconditionally everywhere. Picking an order will impose unnecessary overhead on the losing architecture. In short Squash. FS will always be a dual endian filesystem.
Of library size, static vs dynamic. Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache? Cramfs default maximum file size is 16M (16777215) if file size > 16M, you'll get this message when mkcramfs warning: file sizes truncated to 16MB (minus 1 byte). I need to perform cramfs file system on one file or directory in one partition. What is the typical file limit of a folder on *nix. How to increase the size of a vfat file system to exactly the size of the containing. EXT2 IFS ext2/ext3 file system driver (read only) for MS Windows NT/2000/XP (opensource), latest version in the web archive. Tutorial – Determining Your EXT3 Size Limits; fuse-ext2 An open source ext2/ext3 file system. 9.18 beta 2010-11-02 ----- - 7-Zip now can unpack SquashFS and CramFS filesystem images. 7-Zip created incorrect ZIP archives if file size.
Incidently cramfs is also a dual endian filesystem (not by design, but by virtue of the fact it writes filesystems in the host byte order). Seems we can have many more inodes than blocks? What sorts of > volume limits do we have here? For efficiency Squashfs encodes the location of inode data on disk within the inode number, this means the inode can be directly read without an intermediate inode to disk block lookup. The filesystem can be 4. GB in size which requires 3.
Not sure how bit- fields handle crossing word boundaries, would be > surprised if this were very portable. If you're going to go to the trouble of > swapping the whole thing, I think it'd be easier to just unpack the > and endian- convert the thing so that we didn't have the overhead of > bitfields and unpacking except at read/write time.
Something like: > > void pack(void *src, void *dest, pack.